This post has already been read 393 times!
Olmert’s predicament could be chance for peace
By Ray Hanania — Besieged Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert announced he will not seek re-election in the face of a growing wave of criminal investigations that have targeted his government conduct. Olmert is expected to remain in office until elections are held later this year, but his announcement has put in question the future of the peace talks he helped initiate with Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas. But is the option for peace really over, again? Or, does Olmert’s predicament offer a real opportunity for him to be courageous and bold before he leaves office and initiate a peace deal that just could make real peace possible?
Olmert has worked hard with Abbas to define a new path towards a peace accord, one that revives many of the injured concepts that were at the heart of the peace accord hammered out by Yitzhak Rabin and Yasir Arafat. Rabin was murdered by fanatics, some said were supporters of Netanyahu. Arafat died under an Israeli military siege imposed by Netanyahu and fellow extremist Ariel Sharon.
Netanyahu and Sharon did all they could to kill the Rabin peace accord, rejecting the concept of trading land for peace and giving Palesitnians national sovereignty in the West Bank and even in parts of Arab East Jerusalem.
Yet Olmert could put into writing what his predecessor, Ehud Barak, refused to put on paper for Arafat in the final months of 2000 when the Camp David peace negotiations, brokered by lame duck President Bill Clinton, collapsed.
The collapse of the peace process at Camp David ignited one of the most brutal and vicious waves of violence to sweep through Israel and the Palestinian relations as extremists on both sides fought to seal the coffin on peace.
Yet, why wouldn’t the push for a last minute deal by a lame duck Israeli Prime Minister with time on his hands not spark the same kind of reaction from those who want peace, renewing hope that peace can happen.
For far too long, extremists in Israel and Palestine have had too great of an influence on the peace process. Whenever Rabin and Arafat moved forward towards a peace deal, the extremists struck causing great pain and putting political pressure on Israel’s leaders to back away from the talks.
When Rabin refused to back away from the talks, he was murdered.
As Rabin’s successors tried to revive the peace process in the face of growing public weariness with the terrorism and violence, politics became the turning point. Barak lost his re-election bid to Sharon, who vowed to turn back the pages of the peace process. The terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001 helped Sharon and Netanyahu sign the death warrant for Camp David. Peace has been incarcerated ever since in a prison built on lost hope, lack of confidence and a weariness of faith.
Any peace deal that Olmert negotiates would face a serious and fast challenge from his critics. But, that action could also help re-ignite hope, rebuild confidence and restore faith in the belief that the only solution to the Israel-Palestine conflict is one based on a negotiated compromise and land for peace.
Olmert could not be more disliked than he already is. His popularity ratings are among the lowest of any prime minister in Israel’s history.
But in one quick move to strike a real deal with Abbas and the Palestinians on a peace accord, Olmert could redeem himself.
It won’t prevent the Israeli legal system from pursuing his alleged crimes, but it just might be exactly the kind of unusual move that the peace process needs right now. It is a political risk so great that no other Israeli politician since Rabin has been willing to take, knowing it could jeopardize their career.
But, in Olmert’s case, he has no career left and the only risk he faces is that this kind of gamble might just work.
This post has already been read 393 times!
Ray Hanania is an award winning political columnist and author. He covered Chicago Politics and Chicago City Hall from 1976 through 1992. Hanania began writing in 1975 when he published The Middle Eastern Voice newspaper in Chicago (1975-1977). He later published “The National Arab American Times” newspaper which was distributed through 12,500 Middle East food stores in 48 American States (2004-2007).
Hanania writes weekly columns on Middle East and American Arab issues for the Arab News in Saudi Arabia at www.ArabNews.com, and for TheArabDailyNews.com, and TheDailyHookah.com.
Palestinian, American Arab and Christian, Hanania’s parents originate from Jerusalem and Bethlehem.
Hanania is the recipient of four (4) Chicago Headline Club “Peter Lisagor Awards” for Column writing. In November 2006, he was named “Best Ethnic American Columnist” by the New American Media;In 2009, he received the prestigious Sigma Delta Chi Award for Writing from the Society of Professional Journalists. He is the recipient of the MT Mehdi Courage in Journalism Award. Hanania has also received two (2) Chicago Stick-o-Type awards from the Chicago Newspaper Guild, and in 1990 was nominated by the Chicago Sun-Times for a Pulitzer Prize for his four-part series on the Palestinian Intifada.
His wife and son are Jewish and he performs standup comedy lampooning Arab-Jewish relations, advocating for peace based on non-violence, mutual recognition and Two-States.
His Facebook Page is Facebook.com/rghanania
Email him at: RGHanania@gmail.com
Visit this link to read Ray's column archive at the ArabNews,com ArabNews.com/taxonomy/term/10906
Latest posts by Ray Hanania (see all)
- Technology: Don’t get fooled by Magzter - May 23, 2017
- Boim murder was tragic, but Corrie murder is even worse - May 17, 2017
- Why is my TV clogged with election Ads? - May 12, 2017